|
|
|
|
|
CONFEDERATE
HISTORICAL ASSOCIATION OF BELGIUM |
|
|
NEXT MEETINGS |
|
.. |
|
Saturday 5 September 2026, at 3 PM |
|
.. |
|
|
|
. |
|
For several years, the month of September has not
attracted a large attendance at our meetings. Some
lectures have been presented to only a handful of members.
For this reason, the screening of one or another film
related to the American Civil War has been included in the
program. Unfortunately, the list of films on the subject
available in French is rather limited. Therefore, for the
September meeting, the committee has decided to somewhat
modify the format. We are proposing an open meeting to
which all members are cordially invited. This will provide
everyone with the opportunity either to acquire or to sell
books or objects related to the American Civil War or to
the history of the United States. In addition, members may
bring along one or more items from their collections and
discuss them freely. Of course, there is no obligation to
bring or purchase anything. It will simply be an ideal
opportunity to chat informally and enjoy a refreshment
among friends. The afternoon will be followed, from 6:00
p.m., by an optional supper of cheeses and cold cuts. |
|
. |
|
Price of the supper (drinks not included): 20 €.
Please register with our secretary Dominique De Cleer by
email at d.decleer@scarlet.be or by phone at 0475/77 34 60
and transfer the amount for your meal to account BE90 3100
9059 2632 with the reference CHAB Banquet
no later than August 31. |
|
|
. |
|
|
Saturday 10 October 2026, at 3 PM |
|
.. |
|
|
|
.. |
|
 |
|
. |
|
Lecture by Maurice Jaquemyns:
Cinema and the Civil War,
from historical context to film. Every
artistic production expresses, at a given moment in time,
a vision of the world shaped by its context. From 1900 to
the present day, cinema and television series have shown
an interest in the American Civil War according to the
questions and aspirations of the American public regarding
this pivotal period in their history. A work emerges
within the framework that inspires it: both its origins
and its legacy reflect the evolving issues of domestic and
foreign policy in the United States. Our presentation will
be illustrated with visual materials and representative
documents from films that have left a lasting mark on the
history of cinema. |
|
|
5 |
|
|
Saturday 14 November 2026, at 3 PM |
|
.. |
GEORGE ARMSTRONG CUSTER,
THE ENFANT
TERRIBLE
|
|
|
.. |
|
 |
|
. |
|
Lecture by Farid Ameur:
George Armstrong Custer, the Enfant Terrible.
Born in 1839 in Ohio, George Armstrong Custer was the son
of a blacksmith of German origin. Although he was a
troublesome student, he entered the United States Military
Academy at West Point, where he attracted the attention of
his superiors through his misconduct and his disregard for
military regulations. In July 1861, as the Civil War had
just broken out, he graduated last in his class and joined
his unit in time to receive his baptism of fire at the
First Battle of Bull Run. A devoted, energetic, and
determined cavalry officer, he distinguished himself in
the spring of 1862 during the Peninsula Campaign. Having
caught the attention of General George B. McClellan,
commander of the Army of the Potomac, he was assigned to
McClellan’s staff. The experience proved successful and
opened new opportunities for him. On June 29, 1863,
despite his young age, he was suddenly promoted from
captain to brigadier general of volunteers. At the Battle
of Gettysburg, the Boy General earned his new rank by
leading his forces in two spectacular charges that helped
save the rear of the Federal line at a crucial moment in
the battle. Eager for glory, as brave as he was vain and
egocentric, he multiplied his daring exploits on the
Virginia front. Despite reckless risks, he came to believe
himself invincible. War, in truth, was his natural
element. From the Shenandoah Valley to the final
Appomattox Campaign, he carried out the most dangerous
missions with zeal and composure, becoming a favorite of
public opinion. Shortly before the end of the conflict, he
was promoted to major general, making him the youngest
officer ever to hold such rank in the history of the U.S.
Army. After peace was restored, he was appointed
lieutenant colonel of the 7th Cavalry Regiment and pursued
a controversial career fighting Native Americans on the
Frontier. Obsessed with his own image, he achieved the
immortality he so deeply desired by dying, alongside 262
of his men, at the Battle of the Little Bighorn against a
coalition of Sioux and Cheyenne warriors led by Chief
Sitting Bull. |
|
|
. |
|
|
Saturday 12 December 2026, at 3 PM |
|
.. |
THE INTERVENTION OF THE
UNITED STATES DURING THE MEXICAN REVOLUTION
|
|
|
.. |
|
 |
|
. |
|
Lecture by Jean-Claude Janssens:
The intervention of the United States during the
Mexican Revolution. In 1910, the Mexican
Revolution broke out, ending ten years later after causing
the deaths of nearly two million people. On several
occasions, the United States was forced to intervene, and
in February 1913, President Woodrow Wilson imposed an arms
embargo. The U.S. fleet blockaded Tampico and Veracruz. In
April 1914, the Navy seized Veracruz by force. On March 9,
1916, the revolutionary Pancho Villa attacked the American
outpost of Columbus. Troops under General John J. Pershing
were sent in pursuit of the raiders and crossed the border
on March 15. Among the officers on Pershing’s staff was a
certain Captain George S. Patton. For ten months, the
Americans roamed through Sonora and Chihuahua without
success. Pancho Villa escaped capture, and Pershing
returned empty-handed to the United States in January
1917. That same year, the interception of the Zimmermann
Telegram – Germany’s proposal that Mexico enter the war
against the United States in exchange for the return of
territories lost in 1848 – became one of the many pretexts
that motivated the United States to enter the war against
the German Empire. Thus, a second war with Mexico never
took place. Between 1917 and 1919, sporadic clashes still
occurred along the border. In 1920, the Revolution finally
came to an end, and relations between the two countries
were permanently normalized. |
|
|
5 |
|
|
. |
|
LATEST PAINTINGS OF JOHN PAUL STRAIN |
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
. |
|
BURNING THE TRESTLE AT WOODSTOCK |
FALLEN TIMBERS |
|
|
|
In the spring of 1862, the Shenandoah Valley
became the stage for one of the most brilliant
campaigns of the Civil War. Charged with
protecting the Shenandoah Valley, General
Thomas J. “Stonewall” Jackson maneuvered his
small army with remarkable speed and secrecy,
frustrating Federal attempts to advance
southward. Jackson’s trusted cavalry
commander, Col. Turner Ashby, and his daring
horsemen constantly ambushed the enemy while
reporting on their movements. Ashby also
assisted Jackson in another task that the
general seemed to relish—the destruction of
railroads. The Manassas Gap Railroad threaded
its way through the Valley from Front Royal
southward through Woodstock to Mount Jackson.
It served as an important Federal supply and
transportation route. To deny its use to the
enemy, Jackson repeatedly ordered sections of
track, bridges, and trestles destroyed
wherever opportunity allowed. Just north of
the small town of Woodstock, the railroad
crossed the clear waters of Pugh’s Run on a
timber trestle built along the base of Little
North Mountain. Here Confederate soldiers
piled branches, brushes, and debris around the
base of the vertical support posts and soaked
them with tar, oil, or kerosene before putting
the torch to the structure. Flames quickly ran
upward through the diagonal braces as the dry
timbers created a chimney effect, producing
tall flames rising through the bridge. Once
the supports burned through, the entire
trestle would collapse. Such acts of
calculated destruction became a familiar
feature of Jackson’s Valley operations. Iron
rails were torn up, heated in great fires, and
twisted around nearby trees while trestles and
bridges were burned to prevent their repair.
Few would remain standing. The work earned
Jackson a reputation among friends and foes
alike as an unrelenting destroyer of
railroads. He understood that crippling an
enemy’s lines of supply and easy troop
movement could be as decisive as winning a
battle. Jackson was so focused on this tactic
that his men nicknamed him “The Old
Railroad Wrecker.” As flames climbed the
trestle at Pugh’s Run and smoke drifted across
the valley floor, Jackson and Ashby watched
the destruction of yet another vital link in
the enemy’s transportation network. The two
commanders prepared to move on once more,
continuing their relentless campaign of
maneuver and disruption that would soon make
the Shenandoah Valley Campaign one of the most
famous operations of the Civil War.
|
|
. |
|
© All copyrights reserved
by John Paul Strain Historical Art
|
|
|
Fought in southwest Tennessee, the Battle of
Shiloh would be one of the first major and
bloodiest battles of the Civil War. At
Pittsburg Landing, Tennessee, General
William T. Sherman described the weather in
a letter dated April 3, 1862, saying "It
was “springlike … apples and peaches in
blossom and trees beginning to leaf,
bluebirds singing.” On April 6,
Confederate forces under the command of
General Albert Sidney Johnston launched a
surprise attack at dawn against Union forces
around Pittsburg Landing on the Tennessee
River. The southerner’s attack was
devastating and successful. Although General
Johnston had been killed in his charge
through the “Peach Orchard”, General Grant’s
troops were beaten, taking up a final
defensive line near the river. Now in
command, General P.G.T. Beauregard and his
generals that night made battle plans to
finish off Grant’s army the next morning.
Unknown to them, they would face a new force
of 18,000 fresh troops of the Army of the
Ohio under the command of General Don Carlos
Buell, who would reinforce union troops
hunkered down during the rainy night. When
Confederate forces attacked the following
morning, they soon realized they were facing
a new foe. With fresh reinforcements, Grant
launched a counterattack. Outnumbered and
exhausted, the Confederates withdrew towards
Corinth, Mississippi. Colonel Nathan Bedford
Forrest was assigned the task of covering
the retreating southern army. Forrest
commanded a small rear-guard force of 220
Terry’s Texas Rangers, 40 of his personal
escort, and 40 Mississippians. General Grant
sent Sherman southward on a reconnaissance
to gauge whether the Confederates were
retreating or reorganizing. When Sherman’s
advance guard emerged from woods near a
clearing of downed timber, Forrest and his
Rangers unexpectedly wheeled and charged
straight into the Union line. His sudden
attack scattered the federal horsemen, but
Forrest rode too far ahead of his troops and
was shot point blank by a passing federal
cavalryman with a .54 caliber carbine. The
bullet passed though his left hip and lodged
near his spine. Despite his serious injury,
Forrest fought his way out of the engagement
and rejoined his troops. Forrest’s charge
made Grant and Sherman pull back and abandon
any idea of pushing the retreating
Confederates. In Sherman’s official report
“The enemy’s cavalry came down upon us
at a charge…and we were compelled to fall
back. I became satisfied the enemy was in
too great a force for further pursuit.”
Colonel Forrest’s ferocious countercharge at
Fallen Timbers became legendary. Forrest and
his Rangers had preserved the Confederate
withdrawal towards Corinth. It contributed
greatly to Forrest’s reputation as the most
successful and aggressive cavalry commander
of the war.
|
|
. |
|
© All copyrights reserved
by John Paul Strain Historical Art
|
|
|
|
|
For information or online orders: |
|
www.johnpaulstrain.com |
|
. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|